Comments on: WCAG 2: The Emperor Defends His New Clothes http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200611/wcag-2-the-emperor-defends-his-new-clothes/ standards, accessibility, and ranting and general stuff by the web chemist Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:14:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: Amarjit http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200611/wcag-2-the-emperor-defends-his-new-clothes/#comment-929 Amarjit Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:02:51 +0000 http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200611/wcag-2-the-emperor-defends-his-new-clothes/#comment-929 Good topic, well covered and researched. Personally, I feel unless its easily validates via an external tool like the offline version of Watchfire WCAG, it's not worth my time as a developer testing against. I only know of the Watchfire program (which you have to buy over telephone) which tests a whole website on your computer for accessibility and gives you really helpful advice about how to resolve accessibility problems. What program do you use? Any tools for WCAG 1, or 2 must be made freely available to all to verify accessibility, but equally solutions must be readily available for all to understand and to implement; or else the very word "accessibility" will become an ironic statement based upon the vacuousness of the very subject itself. Good topic, well covered and researched.

Personally, I feel unless its easily validates via an external tool like the offline version of Watchfire WCAG, it’s not worth my time as a developer testing against.

I only know of the Watchfire program (which you have to buy over telephone) which tests a whole website on your computer for accessibility and gives you really helpful advice about how to resolve accessibility problems. What program do you use?

Any tools for WCAG 1, or 2 must be made freely available to all to verify accessibility, but equally solutions must be readily available for all to understand and to implement; or else the very word “accessibility” will become an ironic statement based upon the vacuousness of the very subject itself.

]]>
By: JackP http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200611/wcag-2-the-emperor-defends-his-new-clothes/#comment-932 JackP Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:40:56 +0000 http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200611/wcag-2-the-emperor-defends-his-new-clothes/#comment-932 <p>Ah, Amarjit, <em>there</em> is the crux of the problem.</p> <p>To put it bluntly, an automated tool cannot tell you whether or not a website is accessible. What it can do — and can do <strong>well</strong> is to automatically check certain things — like whether or not your pages validate, and whether or not your images have alt text.</p> <p>It can't do the clever stuff and decide what the meaning is that the image provides to your page, and whether or not your alt text it appropriate.</p> <p>Remember to use your automated tools just as a starting point. But as tools go, I'd recommend:</p> 1.Chris Pederick's web developer toolbar for firefox 2.Vision Australia's Accessibility toolbar for Internet Explorer and Opera 3.the TAW3 automated accessibility checker <p>…I'll update this with links when I get time…</p> Ah, Amarjit, there is the crux of the problem.

To put it bluntly, an automated tool cannot tell you whether or not a website is accessible. What it can do — and can do well is to automatically check certain things — like whether or not your pages validate, and whether or not your images have alt text.

It can’t do the clever stuff and decide what the meaning is that the image provides to your page, and whether or not your alt text it appropriate.

Remember to use your automated tools just as a starting point. But as tools go, I’d recommend:

1.Chris Pederick’s web developer toolbar for firefox
2.Vision Australia’s Accessibility toolbar for Internet Explorer and Opera
3.the TAW3 automated accessibility checker

…I’ll update this with links when I get time…

]]>